1
00:00:06,319 --> 00:00:08,880
I wouldn't be writing the way I write

2
00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:11,920
now if I hadn't read Lewis Carol. And I

3
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:13,679
wouldn't be writing the way I write now

4
00:00:13,679 --> 00:00:17,199
if I hadn't read James Joyce.

5
00:00:17,199 --> 00:00:19,600
I read Czechov when I was probably 18 or

6
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:21,760
19. And Czechov made a strong impression

7
00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:24,720
on me. I also read Emily Bronte

8
00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:27,119
Weathering Heights when I was about 15

9
00:00:27,119 --> 00:00:29,599
and that made a strong impression. All

10
00:00:29,599 --> 00:00:32,000
writers have mentors

11
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:34,239
who begin when they're children and

12
00:00:34,239 --> 00:00:36,800
they're aware of writing. They're aware

13
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:39,280
of books that they love.

14
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,480
Like is it the the Phantom Toll booth?

15
00:00:42,480 --> 00:00:44,879
Some children love that. So they say the

16
00:00:44,879 --> 00:00:47,360
Phantom Toll booth along with Alice and

17
00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:51,360
Wonderland where the wild things are and

18
00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,879
for older children JK Rowling's u the

19
00:00:54,879 --> 00:00:58,079
Harry Potter novels they they all exist

20
00:00:58,079 --> 00:01:01,840
in sort of like a a stratosphere

21
00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:05,920
that allows the young person to read

22
00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:08,240
work that is established and very well

23
00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:10,400
done. So when the writer starts to

24
00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:13,040
write, he or she's drawing upon some of

25
00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:17,320
these these mentors.

26
00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:25,119
I would say almost dogmatically that you

27
00:01:25,119 --> 00:01:27,360
can't be a writer unless you're reading

28
00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:30,960
all the time and reading with purpose.

29
00:01:30,960 --> 00:01:33,439
Not just reading to waste time or

30
00:01:33,439 --> 00:01:36,640
reading something on the internet, but

31
00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:39,759
reading crafted work. If you just sit

32
00:01:39,759 --> 00:01:41,600
down and read a little novel by Gene

33
00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:44,000
Ree, which is like wide sarcastle sea,

34
00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:47,439
it's like maybe 120 pages,

35
00:01:47,439 --> 00:01:51,680
that nolla, that short novel is so good

36
00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:53,600
that when you start writing the next

37
00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,240
day, you're going to be writing better.

38
00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:58,560
You're not going to be imitating her,

39
00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:00,159
but you'll be writing better than you

40
00:02:00,159 --> 00:02:02,799
would be if you hadn't read her. And so

41
00:02:02,799 --> 00:02:05,680
reading is the springboard to writing.

42
00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:07,520
What you read and how with what

43
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:09,759
intensity you read is going to determine

44
00:02:09,759 --> 00:02:13,040
probably what you write because you all

45
00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:16,160
all human beings are imitative primates.

46
00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,319
We belong to the big primate family like

47
00:02:18,319 --> 00:02:22,000
apes and and chimpanzees and and monkeys

48
00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:24,080
of all kinds. You know, monkey see,

49
00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:26,560
monkey do. We are very imitative

50
00:02:26,560 --> 00:02:29,440
species. So when you're a little older,

51
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,000
you may want to read classic writing.

52
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:34,480
You may want to read Faulner, Hemingway,

53
00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:37,120
James Joyce, Kafka, Thomas Man, Virginia

54
00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:39,599
Wolf. You Henry James. You may want to

55
00:02:39,599 --> 00:02:42,560
aim very high because the more you read

56
00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:45,200
and the more you're absorbing when you

57
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,120
start to write, you're going to write on

58
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:49,280
a higher level than you would be if you

59
00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:52,319
if you didn't read these people. And so

60
00:02:52,319 --> 00:02:54,480
it's like the old saying, if you want to

61
00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,319
learn how to play tennis, you play

62
00:02:56,319 --> 00:02:58,080
tennis with somebody who's better than

63
00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:00,319
you. You don't play tennis with somebody

64
00:03:00,319 --> 00:03:01,920
who's not as good as you because you're

65
00:03:01,920 --> 00:03:04,400
never ever going to learn anything. So

66
00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:07,519
reading Ulisses by James Joyce, take a

67
00:03:07,519 --> 00:03:10,400
whole summer, just spend time reading

68
00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:13,360
it, and you'll first of all, it's a

69
00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:15,920
great work of art and it's enthralling.

70
00:03:15,920 --> 00:03:18,080
It's difficult, but it is truly

71
00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:21,200
fascinating. And you'll find that as the

72
00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:24,159
weeks go by, your vocabulary will start

73
00:03:24,159 --> 00:03:27,680
to improve. Your sense of language will

74
00:03:27,680 --> 00:03:30,560
elevate. And when you write, you may

75
00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:33,360
sound nothing like James Joyce. Nothing.

76
00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:35,200
But yet, you sound much better than you

77
00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:36,799
would have if you hadn't read James

78
00:03:36,799 --> 00:03:39,799
Joyce.

79
00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:45,760
There are two kinds of readings that are

80
00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:48,159
really helpful to young writers. One of

81
00:03:48,159 --> 00:03:51,519
them is spontaneous and improvised where

82
00:03:51,519 --> 00:03:53,840
you simply find a book maybe in a

83
00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:56,560
library or in a bookstore and you can

84
00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:58,560
even be drawn by the cover and just

85
00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:00,879
start reading it and be plunged into a

86
00:04:00,879 --> 00:04:03,360
world you didn't anticipate. You might

87
00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:05,920
really love that book. It might change

88
00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:07,599
your life or it might not be too

89
00:04:07,599 --> 00:04:09,920
important. Then the other kind of

90
00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:13,280
reading is systematic. You decide very

91
00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:15,920
you decide very clearly that you're

92
00:04:15,920 --> 00:04:18,639
going to read all of the young Hemingway

93
00:04:18,639 --> 00:04:21,120
short stories because it's mostly his

94
00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:23,040
short stories I think that are helpful

95
00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:26,479
to writers rather than the novels.

96
00:04:26,479 --> 00:04:28,880
Hemingway's novels are are good novels

97
00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:30,560
but it's the short stories that he was

98
00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:34,080
really a master at. So you just say to

99
00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:36,639
yourself, I'm going to read 25 short

100
00:04:36,639 --> 00:04:39,280
stories by Ernest Hemingway and I'm

101
00:04:39,280 --> 00:04:41,680
going to read them more than once and

102
00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:44,400
and learn from them. So that that kind

103
00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:47,120
of reading is what you may get in a

104
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,759
university course or community college

105
00:04:49,759 --> 00:04:52,080
or your own, you know, maybe it could be

106
00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,560
a course online or whatever. It's

107
00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:56,400
systematic. But the other kind of

108
00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:58,240
reading is just spontaneous. And I've

109
00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:01,120
had so many extraordinary experiences

110
00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:04,880
with just um improvised reading. In

111
00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:06,479
fact, one day I was just looking at a

112
00:05:06,479 --> 00:05:08,479
book maybe in a library. I'm not even

113
00:05:08,479 --> 00:05:12,720
sure that it was a book I that I picked

114
00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:14,639
up. I It was basically on a library

115
00:05:14,639 --> 00:05:16,800
table. I think I was looking at a

116
00:05:16,800 --> 00:05:18,720
history of America, maybe popular

117
00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:20,880
culture. And I turned a page and there

118
00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:24,479
was a picture of a girl about 16 and she

119
00:05:24,479 --> 00:05:27,759
had brown hair and a very pretty face

120
00:05:27,759 --> 00:05:29,919
though not glamorous. And I wondered

121
00:05:29,919 --> 00:05:31,440
like who's that? She looks like my

122
00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:33,440
mother or she looked like girls I went

123
00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:35,280
to school with. So I thought it was

124
00:05:35,280 --> 00:05:37,840
Norma Jean Baker the woman who would

125
00:05:37,840 --> 00:05:40,240
become Marilyn Monroe.

126
00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:43,120
And I was just astonished at this

127
00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:45,840
snapshot of this girl because she looked

128
00:05:45,840 --> 00:05:47,440
nothing like Marilyn Monroe. She didn't

129
00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:50,320
have that blonde hair and she wasn't

130
00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:52,800
radiantly beautiful. She was just

131
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,039
pretty. And so I thought, well, maybe

132
00:05:55,039 --> 00:05:57,919
I'll read about her. So it was just

133
00:05:57,919 --> 00:06:01,120
totally an accident. So eventually I

134
00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:04,560
wrote a 1400page novel really based on

135
00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:06,479
just the accident of seeing that

136
00:06:06,479 --> 00:06:09,440
snapshot, which is amazing because I I

137
00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:10,880
might not have gone into the library

138
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:12,400
that day. I might have done something

139
00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:14,880
else. I might have decided I didn't want

140
00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:16,639
to look at that book. So it was really

141
00:06:16,639 --> 00:06:19,120
an accident. So I think along with the

142
00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:22,240
systematic and purposeful reading you

143
00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:26,039
have to have a lot of accidents.

144
00:06:29,919 --> 00:06:31,520
Obviously the reading is the first

145
00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,600
experience and if impressionistically it

146
00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:35,919
made a really strong impression on you,

147
00:06:35,919 --> 00:06:37,840
you want to reread it. So then you

148
00:06:37,840 --> 00:06:39,680
notice the second time through how it's

149
00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:43,039
based, how it's structured. A writer is

150
00:06:43,039 --> 00:06:45,039
seeing how it's put together. So I

151
00:06:45,039 --> 00:06:47,360
always notice like what's the title?

152
00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:49,280
What's the first paragraph, the first

153
00:06:49,280 --> 00:06:52,080
sentences, is the first chapter very

154
00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:54,960
short, is it long, is it divided into

155
00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:57,600
sections? To to me, all those formal

156
00:06:57,600 --> 00:06:59,280
qualities of the work are very

157
00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:01,759
interesting. But I wouldn't expect when

158
00:07:01,759 --> 00:07:03,360
my mother was reading my work, I

159
00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:05,599
wouldn't expect my mother or my father

160
00:07:05,599 --> 00:07:08,400
to have any interest at all or to be

161
00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:10,800
aware of any of that. Like my mother

162
00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:12,800
wouldn't say to me, "Oh, Joyce, I love

163
00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:15,759
this structure of your novel." And when

164
00:07:15,759 --> 00:07:18,319
I was on the Oprah show some years ago

165
00:07:18,319 --> 00:07:21,039
for my novel, we were the Mulanies.

166
00:07:21,039 --> 00:07:22,560
There were a number of women on the

167
00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:26,240
Oprah show with me. And all of them

168
00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:29,360
talked about my novel to me, but not one

169
00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:30,800
of them talked about the formal

170
00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:32,720
qualities. They only talked about the

171
00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:35,680
characters. In other words, most readers

172
00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:38,000
are reading for character and then

173
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:40,080
they're reading for a plot, but the

174
00:07:40,080 --> 00:07:42,319
writer has to present that in the most

175
00:07:42,319 --> 00:07:44,240
coherent way possible, in the most

176
00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:46,720
effective way. So, it's like you're

177
00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:48,720
making a film. People look at a movie,

178
00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:50,800
they sit back in the seat, and they see

179
00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:53,120
this movie and they really enjoy it and

180
00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:55,599
they love it. They have not one

181
00:07:55,599 --> 00:07:57,599
millionth idea of all the work that goes

182
00:07:57,599 --> 00:07:59,759
into it. They don't know how the movie

183
00:07:59,759 --> 00:08:01,680
had pre-production, how there was

184
00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:04,160
research, how years went by. They don't

185
00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:05,919
know how many people worked on it, who

186
00:08:05,919 --> 00:08:08,400
the script writers were. They don't even

187
00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:10,160
know who the directors. I mean, most

188
00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,319
people have no interest in the formal

189
00:08:12,319 --> 00:08:15,120
qualities. But if you're in that world,

190
00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:17,039
the formal qualities are really the only

191
00:08:17,039 --> 00:08:20,400
ones that matter. Like, how did how did

192
00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:23,039
James Joyce put Ulyses together to me is

193
00:08:23,039 --> 00:08:25,520
very interesting. Whereas to a reader,

194
00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:28,160
maybe not so much. So, if you're going

195
00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:30,240
to be a writer, it's like if you're

196
00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:32,080
going to be a cabinet builder, you have

197
00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:34,080
to look at a cabinet and you have to go

198
00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:36,640
to the cabinet maker and say, "How did

199
00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:38,240
you make this wonderful cabinet?"

200
00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:40,880
Because I can't see it with my eyes. I

201
00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:45,080
have to somehow learn about it.

202
00:08:48,959 --> 00:08:52,000
The formal qualities of a work are most

203
00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,279
obvious when one spends time maybe

204
00:08:55,279 --> 00:08:57,839
discussing them with other people. I

205
00:08:57,839 --> 00:09:00,800
think learning by yourself is not so

206
00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:04,000
effective. Most of my learning

207
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:07,920
about Hemingway Faulner and James Joyce

208
00:09:07,920 --> 00:09:10,480
I did alone. I didn't really have a

209
00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:12,080
structure.

210
00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:14,080
But I think if you could take a college

211
00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:16,880
course, take a course in writing, a

212
00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:19,519
writing workshop where with other people

213
00:09:19,519 --> 00:09:21,279
sitting around a table, you're actually

214
00:09:21,279 --> 00:09:25,279
thinking and talking about Hemingway,

215
00:09:25,279 --> 00:09:27,680
it could be Jodie Picot, who is a

216
00:09:27,680 --> 00:09:29,839
wonderful contemporary writer, a popular

217
00:09:29,839 --> 00:09:32,160
best-selling writer. We have people like

218
00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:35,200
in a book club. So you have people

219
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:37,680
sharing something that they read and

220
00:09:37,680 --> 00:09:39,600
somebody says, "Well, I really like this

221
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:41,839
passage." somebody else said, you know,

222
00:09:41,839 --> 00:09:43,600
I don't like this character and then

223
00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:46,000
discuss it or what don't you like about

224
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:48,240
that character or I really like the

225
00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:50,240
ending of the novel or somebody else

226
00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,399
says I didn't like the ending and to

227
00:09:52,399 --> 00:09:54,560
sort of discuss it in that formal way

228
00:09:54,560 --> 00:09:56,959
rather than saying I liked it or didn't

229
00:09:56,959 --> 00:10:00,160
like it is too simple but like why what

230
00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:02,320
did you like about it? Those are things

231
00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:04,480
that you learn by you know reading it

232
00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:07,040
more than once. But I I think the best

233
00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:09,760
way to to enjoy literature is with other

234
00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:12,160
people.
